<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
		<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
		  <title type="text">SkillShare Forum - CSS Beauty - Anyone uses inDesign for web design?</title>
		  <updated>2013-05-25T17:12:51-04:00</updated>
		  <id>http://cssbeauty.com/skillshare/</id>
		  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" hreflang="en" href="http://cssbeauty.com/skillshare/discussion/?DiscussionID=3131&amp;Focus=16129"/>
		  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://cssbeauty.com/skillshare/discussion/?DiscussionID=3131&amp;Focus=16129&amp;Feed=Atom"/>
		  <generator uri="http://getvanilla.com/" version="1.1.9">
			 Lussumo Vanilla
		  </generator>
		  <entry>
		<title>Anyone uses inDesign for web design?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://cssbeauty.com/skillshare/discussion/3131/?Focus=16125#Comment_16125" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://cssbeauty.com/skillshare/discussion/3131/?Focus=16125#Comment_16125</id>
		<published>2009-04-27T01:51:11-04:00</published>
		<updated>2013-05-25T17:12:51-04:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>fransgaard</name>
			<uri>http://cssbeauty.com/skillshare/account/1861/</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			Although I was original a print designer using Quark X-Press I haven't done any print work for over 10 years so I don't know inDesign. 

But recently somebody asked me why we as digital designers ...
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[Although I was original a print designer using Quark X-Press I haven't done any print work for over 10 years so I don't know inDesign. <br /><br />But recently somebody asked me why we as digital designers do not use inDesign for layouts. <br /><br />So was wondering if any web designers here have any experience with using inDesign for web design. <br /><br />Do anybody have any good/bad experiences they can share?<br /><br />Cheers]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Anyone uses inDesign for web design?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://cssbeauty.com/skillshare/discussion/3131/?Focus=16126#Comment_16126" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://cssbeauty.com/skillshare/discussion/3131/?Focus=16126#Comment_16126</id>
		<published>2009-04-27T08:14:54-04:00</published>
		<updated>2013-05-25T17:12:51-04:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>waveslaves</name>
			<uri>http://cssbeauty.com/skillshare/account/3682/</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			Hi fransgaard,
I guess you can use any design program you want to web design, I use illustrator and photoshop but i don't see why you can't use indesign, after all it's easy to rasterize an indesign ...
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[Hi fransgaard,<br />I guess you can use any design program you want to web design, I use illustrator and photoshop but i don't see why you can't use indesign, after all it's easy to rasterize an indesign file into photoshop and splice it's elements up. I guess as many web designers are on PC and haven't got indesign would be the only reason i can think of! Cheers Matt.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.design-intellect.co.uk" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.design-intellect.co.uk</a>]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Anyone uses inDesign for web design?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://cssbeauty.com/skillshare/discussion/3131/?Focus=16129#Comment_16129" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://cssbeauty.com/skillshare/discussion/3131/?Focus=16129#Comment_16129</id>
		<published>2009-04-29T01:10:29-04:00</published>
		<updated>2013-05-25T17:12:51-04:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>fransgaard</name>
			<uri>http://cssbeauty.com/skillshare/account/1861/</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			Hiya, thanks for that.
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[Hiya, thanks for that.]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Anyone uses inDesign for web design?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" href="http://cssbeauty.com/skillshare/discussion/3131/?Focus=16130#Comment_16130" type="application/xhtml+xml" hreflang="en"/>
		<id>http://cssbeauty.com/skillshare/discussion/3131/?Focus=16130#Comment_16130</id>
		<published>2009-04-29T12:40:44-04:00</published>
		<updated>2013-05-25T17:12:51-04:00</updated>
		<author>
			<name>justen</name>
			<uri>http://cssbeauty.com/skillshare/account/3679/</uri>
		</author>
		<summary type="text" xml:lang="en">
			ID's tools are built explicitly with print in mind and meant to emulate the feel and workflow of traditional print design; as a well-designed app, it does not waste much time on features that don't ...
		</summary>
		<content type="html">
			<![CDATA[ID's tools are built explicitly with print in mind and meant to emulate the feel and workflow of traditional print design; as a well-designed app, it does not waste much time on features that don't fit into that intent. For web design Fireworks delivers web-oriented tools that you won't find in other applications (for instance the way it handles design elements as separate objects, the Pages tool in CS4, or the PNG8-alpha export that you won't find in any other major design app). Photoshop pulls a distant 2nd, and I still switch into it and Illustrator when I need to build something to bring into a Fireworks layout. They all come in the Adobe master collection and Design Premium collection though, so I don't see why someone would use a sub-optimal tool that wasn't intended for the purpose of web design when you get them all in the same pack. I'm not incredibly experienced with inDesign, mind you; the only time I use it is when working with print designers who use it. Maybe someone who has used it more extensively can give a detailed breakdown. <br /><br />Oh @waveslaves: InDesign is in the master collection and the design premium package at least in CS3 + CS4 for both PC and Mac. Note that the newer CS versions are *not* backward compatible with earlier ID documents which is a huge pain in the ass.]]>
		</content>
	</entry>
	
		</feed>