<rss version="2.0">
		<channel>
			<title>SkillShare Forum - CSS Beauty - What are your web design predictions for 2006?</title>
			<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 02:43:05 -0400</lastBuildDate>
			<link>http://cssbeauty.com/skillshare/</link>
			<description></description>
			<generator>Lussumo Vanilla 1.1.9</generator>
			<item>
		<title>What are your web design predictions for 2006?</title>
		<link>http://cssbeauty.com/skillshare/discussion/46/?Focus=285#Comment_285</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cssbeauty.com/skillshare/discussion/46/?Focus=285#Comment_285</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 20:29:08 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>j.bish</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[<a href="http://www.cameronmoll.com/archives/000666.html" >Cameron Moll</a>, <a href="http://airbagindustries.com/" >Airbag Industries</a>, and <a href="http://www.andybudd.com/archives/2005/12/web_design_and_development_trends_for_2006/" >Andy Budd</a> have all offered their predictions for 2006.  (And there's <a href="http://www.adampolselli.com/2005/" >this year-old color forecast</a> by Adam Poselli that I still think is really cool.)<br /><br />What do you think will be big in web design in 2006?  What colors, layout styles, typography, etc., will web developers be using?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>What are your web design predictions for 2006?</title>
		<link>http://cssbeauty.com/skillshare/discussion/46/?Focus=287#Comment_287</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cssbeauty.com/skillshare/discussion/46/?Focus=287#Comment_287</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 20:46:02 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>nifkin</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[A huge rush back to HTML 3.2!]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>What are your web design predictions for 2006?</title>
		<link>http://cssbeauty.com/skillshare/discussion/46/?Focus=290#Comment_290</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cssbeauty.com/skillshare/discussion/46/?Focus=290#Comment_290</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 21:11:09 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>SpookyET</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Millions of BOOs towards IE7.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>What are your web design predictions for 2006?</title>
		<link>http://cssbeauty.com/skillshare/discussion/46/?Focus=291#Comment_291</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cssbeauty.com/skillshare/discussion/46/?Focus=291#Comment_291</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 21:18:05 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>admin</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[Next year will be the "Fluid Layouts" year.... Lots of white space usage as well.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>What are your web design predictions for 2006?</title>
		<link>http://cssbeauty.com/skillshare/discussion/46/?Focus=325#Comment_325</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cssbeauty.com/skillshare/discussion/46/?Focus=325#Comment_325</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 10:42:40 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>eightface</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I agree with Alex, I think people will be paying more attention to the negative space (or white space) in their layouts.  On the other hand, I don't think we'll be seeing fluid layouts in the classical sense but something more along the lines of <a href="http://particletree.com/features/dynamic-resolution-dependent-layouts/" >dynamic resolution dependant layouts</a>, so there will be more content and material available if there is more screen space, it won't just be a wider layout.<br /><br />There's a trend towards larger, more readable font sizes and forms.  People are noticing that you can say less with more impact if you font size is larger than 10px.  I think we'll see more people ditching smaller sizes.<br /><br />The biggest thing I'm hoping for is a move away from the austere white layouts that all of the new 'web-apps' seem to use.  It's functional and looks minimal (kind of like the old old web) but it's getting to be a bit much.  And enough with the pastels, it feels like a seven-year old girl vomitted happiness everywhere.  <a href="http://www.firewheeldesign.com/" >Firewheel Design</a> is good example of looking like the other guys but standing out in a crowd with the snazzy dark and vibrant colours.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>What are your web design predictions for 2006?</title>
		<link>http://cssbeauty.com/skillshare/discussion/46/?Focus=326#Comment_326</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cssbeauty.com/skillshare/discussion/46/?Focus=326#Comment_326</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 10:48:16 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>SpookyET</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[I this liquid site <a href="http://www.sercotransarctic.com/home" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.sercotransarctic.com/home</a>  I don't agree with the font size though.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>What are your web design predictions for 2006?</title>
		<link>http://cssbeauty.com/skillshare/discussion/46/?Focus=327#Comment_327</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cssbeauty.com/skillshare/discussion/46/?Focus=327#Comment_327</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 10:53:04 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>adjustafresh</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[My prediction:<br />I believe that websites will be designed in 2006.<br /><br />Seriously... Watch for png transparencies EVERYWHERE.]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>What are your web design predictions for 2006?</title>
		<link>http://cssbeauty.com/skillshare/discussion/46/?Focus=328#Comment_328</link>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cssbeauty.com/skillshare/discussion/46/?Focus=328#Comment_328</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:19:21 -0500</pubDate>
		<author>nifkin</author>
		<description>
			<![CDATA[nobody's put <a href="http://www.dashes.com/anil/2005/09/06/web_development" >Anil Dash's list</a> up yet?]]>
		</description>
	</item>
	
		</channel>
	</rss>